About Discussion
The post depicts a thorough examination and comprehension of the spiritual in relation to copyright law. I agree with the post's notion that copyright laws and spiritual rules can be treated equally, but I also see the message from a different angle. Spiritual laws, like expressions of traditional culture and traditional knowledge, are rarely enforced by any court of law, instead relying on the rule of conscience. As a result, I approach spiritual subjects and laws with rationality, because religion has a greater influence on individuals because it stems from self-conviction.
Copying someone else's work is against the law, according to copyright laws.When a person copies somebody’s work, there should be an accompaniment of citations to acknowledge the original author and a list of reference (APA, 2010). However, this post seems to address paraphrasing a material in your own words like a recommendable idea. To some extent is trues, like for the case of the cited song, but direct paraphrasing using different words means that the work will lack originality. The ideas will be plagiarized, therefore, it is good to read someone work, synthesize, comprehend it and develop one’s strong ideas (Chaddah, 2014).
Response 3
Quality of Evidence
The quality of evidence is dependent on how the writer utilizes the copyrights, citation and reference (Fink, 2013). For instance, there should be evidence if the writer is quoting some parts or the whole of Mr. Cash lyrical song. The evidence helps to identify the facts that have been proven by other researchers and validate the authors work so that any person, reading the document, can be able to retrieve the acknowledged sources of the author. The post puts it plain that situatedness can jeopardize the quality of evidence because of positive and cognitive influence in the way a writer interprets or paraphrases the text (Miles, Chapman & Francis, 2015, p. 293).
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Chaddah, P. (2014). Not all plagiarism requires a retraction: papers that plagiarize only text can still contribute to the literature, but any errors or omissions should be prominently corrected, says Praveen Chaddah. Nature, 511(7508), 127-128.
Fink, A. (2013). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper. Sage Publications.
Miles, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2015). Peeling the onion: Understanding others' lived experience. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing
Paterson, R. K. (2017). Canadian and international traditional knowledge and cultural expression systems. Intellectual Property Journal, 29(2), 191-276. Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1890508659?accountid=14872
Academic levels
Skills
Paper formats
Urgency types
Assignment types
Prices that are easy on your wallet
Our experts are ready to do an excellent job starting at $14.99 per page
We at GrabMyEssay.com
work according to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which means you have the control over your personal data. All payment transactions go through a secure online payment system, thus your Billing information is not stored, saved or available to the Company in any way. Additionally, we guarantee confidentiality and anonymity all throughout your cooperation with our Company.